12/9/2023 0 Comments Hoyt carbon element g3 reviews![]() Any modification to any bow or component will immediately void any and all warranty for the bow and/or component. Drilling holes, cutting, filing, sanding, or other forms of physical modifications to any Hoyt bow or component will dam- age the bow and could possibly cause harm or injury to the owner or bystanders. Damage, including impact dam- age, caused accidentally, from misuse of the product, or from use not associated with normal archery practices, is NOT covered under the Hoyt Limited Lifetime warranty.ģ) Hoyt Carbon Risers, or any other component of any Hoyt bow, should not be modified in any way. If the riser is determined to be damaged and not fit for use, Hoyt may offer a replacement of damaged components at the owner’s expense. (See warranty informa- tion for instructions on returning product to Hoyt). In the event that the bow was exposed to an impact and damage is evident as described above, you can return the bow to Hoyt for an evaluation. If any of the above conditions are apparent or suspected, the bow should be considered damaged and should not be drawn or used any further. If impacted, inspect the area for visible broken fibers, multitude of separation cracks, cracking that appears to resemble a spider-web, dented surface, or a soft flexible surface at the impact point. In the event that your bow does encounter a surface impact, you must carefully inspect the riser for damage. However, in general, composite structures do not with- stand high load impact such as being dropped from a tree, or by having some other object impact the structure. Hoyt Carbon Risers are designed to withstand high stress flexing and high stress loading that would be asso- ciated with normal use and function of the bow. If the bow has no structural failure, the bow will be returned and can resume normal use.Ģ) Extreme care should be taken to avoid impact damage to a Hoyt Carbon Riser. If the bow is found to have a structural failure, the riser will be repaired or replaced under the normal condi- tions of Hoyt’s Limited Lifetime Warranty. Center shot was done and re-checked by modified french tuning as per N&B. less than a foot on the right, but still not there. (See war- ranty information for instructions on returning product to Hoyt). Since i got it, it had infamous left tear and bare shafts were hitting a foot on right side, same height. These are typically not fractures or breaks in the carbon fibers them- selves and do not represent a structural failure.įor separations that are larger than 1/8 inch in length and/or wider than 1/32 inch wide, the bow should be returned to Hoyt for inspection and testing. WITH TRUGLO QUIVER AND FIBER OPTIC SIGHT, HAS COSMETIC SCUFFS/ SCRATCHES, NEEDS TO. These small separations are considered normal and non-structural provided that they are under 1/8 inch in length and less than 1/32 inch wide at its widest location. Description: BOW: HOYT ARCHERY CARBON ELEMENT G3, DRAW 60-70 LB, 28 LENGTH. This is a typical composite condition which may become more visible as the bow is used over time. HOYT CARBON RISER SPECIAL PRECAUTIONS AND INFORMATION:ġ) Composite constructed components, such as Hoyt Carbon Risers, may show small surface separations in the paint and/or top surface layer of the construction. I wish Hoyt would make an aluminum version of the carbon risers though, they are just flat out cool looking. I just felt there was less to worry about with the aluminum riser. All the disclaimers and warnings damaged my calm about the carbon bows. At least part of the reason is this following section from the Hoyt owner's manual. However, in an ideal world you would try them side by side with something new and of equivalent price as that is what will give the best indication.Īlso, if they've had ten years of use and being knocked about, I'd be looking at a new limb.I went with the Spyder Turbo. Maybe the SF Elite Carbon limbs or the Hoyt carbon 840s would be a good comparison. I'm guessing, but I think that you ought to be comparing them to carbon limbs (whether foam or wood cored) around the lower middle of the range mark today. That said, they were fairly popular as they offered a stable and consistent shot. Performance wise, they weren't amazing - I remember being underwhelmed by the slight increase in performance over a set of fibreglass and wood cored limbs that I had previously, and they had a bit of a reputation for stacking (which was liked by some archers) but this wasn't something I noticed as I have a short draw length. Mine set me back about ?420 at the time if I remember rightly and this was about as much as you could spend on a top of the line limb then and they seem to have jumped up in price since. G3s were a top of the range limb about 10 years ago made from carbon with a carbon foam core. This is finger in the air stuff - comparing apples with oranges.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |